US House passes assault weapons ban after wave of gun violence


WASHINGTON — The U.S. House of Representatives on Friday passed a ban on semi-automatic firearms — the weapons used in multiple mass shootings over the past three months — in a vote close to the party line .

With the 217-213 votes, The law project, HR 1808, will head to the equally divided Senate, but is unlikely to make progress there, as it would take all Democrats on board plus 10 Republicans to overcome a filibuster. Sen. Chuck Schumer, the Senate Majority Leader, has not announced whether he plans to put the gun ban to a vote.

“Every year, more children die from gun violence than from any other cause,” House Speaker Nancy Pelosi said on the floor of the House. “Our nation has witnessed indescribable horror as assault weapons have been used in massacre after massacre.”

All but five Democrats backed the ban. Only two Republicans voted for: Brian Fitzpatrick of Pennsylvania and Chris Jacobs of New York.

The five Democrats who split from their party and opposed the ban were Representatives Jared Golden of Maine, Kurt Schrader of Oregon, Ron Kind of Wisconsin, and Henry Cuellar and Vicente Gonzalez of Texas.

The push to ban semi-automatic firearms came after they were used in mass shootings in Uvalde, Texas, where 19 children and two teachers were murdered, and in Buffalo, New York, where a white supremacist murdered 10 black people in a grocery store. A semi-automatic weapon was also used in a July 4 shooting in Highland Park, Illinois, where seven people were killed.

The bill’s sponsor, Rep. David Cicilline, a Democrat from Rhode Island, said movie theaters, places of worship, schools, hospitals and grocery stores have become “bloody battlefield scenes.”

“These weapons have no place in our communities,” he said. “There are more mass shootings than days in the year. This is a uniquely American problem.

This year alone, there have been 372 mass shootings, according to the Gun Violence Archives.

Police fundraising bills

The assault weapons ban was originally slated to pass alongside several bills that would provide funding to local police departments, but progressive Democrats have raised concerns and pushed for more accountability measures in the police legislation.

“I’ve heard from the civil rights community and I have serious concerns about two police bills that we may consider this week,” said Rep. Andy Levin, a Democrat from Michigan, wrote on Twitter. “We shouldn’t be pushing them forward unless they include strong accountability and oversight provisions consistent with those of the George Floyd Justice in Policing Act.”

Representative Josh Gottheimer, a Democrat from New Jersey, is the main sponsor of a bill this would authorize a grant of $50 million each year for a Department of Justice program to help small local police departments. Another one invoice would reauthorize a grant program to hire and raise the pay of local police.

Representative Val Demings, Democrat of Florida and former Orlando police chief, candidate for the seat of Republican Senator Marco Rubio, sponsored a bill providing $100 million a year in grants to help police departments solve violent crimes.

The initiatives come as Democratic leaders attempt to repel to be seen as a party that wants to “defund the police”, a slogan that many members have disavowed, as well as Biden. Republicans have called Democrats insufficiently supportive of police ahead of the midterm elections.

At a weekly press conference on Friday, Pelosi, speaking out about progressives’ concerns, said the police bill was not “funding without accountability.” In the House, she said after the August recess, Democrats would pass the policing and public safety bill package.

Weapons ban

The United States House Judiciary Committee past the gun ban last week in a party vote.

The bill bans all semi-automatic rifles that may have a detachable magazine and have a military feature such as a pistol grip and detachable stock or grenade launcher, among other features. This too bans “all semi-automatic rifles that have a fixed magazine with the capacity to accept more than 10 rounds.”

The bill, if enacted, would not ban current semi-automatic weapons that people own, meaning current gun owners would have their guns grandfathered.

House Republicans opposed to the bill argued it would take semi-automatic weapons away from current owners, but Democrats said that was wrong because they would be grandfathered.

During debate in the House, Representative Guy Reschenthaler, a Republican from Pennsylvania, declared the bill unconstitutional, calling it a “take on arms”.

“Law-abiding Americans use guns every day,” he said.

Representative Deborah Ross, a Democrat from North Carolina, denied that people would lose their guns.

“It just prevents future assault rifle sales,” she said, adding that the guns “are not designed for recreation, they are designed for combat.”

Representative Jim Jordan, a Republican from Ohio, also accused Democrats of “coming for your guns.”

White House support

The White House Published a statement Friday in support of the bill.

“40,000 Americans die each year from gunshot wounds, and firearms have become the leading cause of child death in the United States,” the statement said. “As President Biden has repeatedly asked, we must do more to stop this gun violence and save lives.”

House Democrats have held numerous hearings on gun violence in the United States, most recently this week when the House Oversight and Reform Committee investigated the profits gun manufacturers have made from semi-automatic weapons. The CEOs of two arms manufacturers said during the audience that they played no role in the mass shootings that used their products.

The passage of the bill by the House follows another bill on firearms which Biden signed the law end of June following the mass shootings in Texas and New York. That bill, the Bipartisan Safer Communities Act, includes eight provisions, including $750 million for states to enact red flag laws that allow courts to temporarily remove a firearm from an individual who poses a threat. for himself or for others; a historic $11 billion in mental health services for schools and families; and a requirement that gun buyers under the age of 21 undergo a background check that examines juvenile and mental health records, among other things.

When Biden was a member of the Senate, he backed a 10-year ban on assault weapons that passed in 1994, but it expired a decade later and Congress never renewed it.

Research by a group of injury epidemiologists and trauma surgeons has shown that between 2004 and 2017, “the average number of annual deaths attributed to mass shootings was 25, compared to 5.3 during the 10-year ban and 7.2 in the years before the gun ban ‘assault”.


Comments are closed.